Tuesday, October 12, 2010

Tom Jackson's longstanding friendship with Bill Belichick and the Randy Moss trade...


I’ve taken quite a break from this blog, but like MJ in the fourth quarter, the comeback was inevitable. (Ok, perhaps I'm not in His Airness's class, but it sounded cool you can't deny it.) And a lot’s happened in the many weeks that I’ve been lounging in one of the most densely populated counties in the world.

Probably my favorite story (other than Brett Favre agreeing with Brent Musburger about Jenn Sterger), was the Randy Moss trade. Perhaps more accurately, I loved the fallout from it.

Predictably, Viking fans were pumped while many Patriot fans were distraught (as they should be. The guy was had the greatest 16 game season of any receiver EVER in 2007 and didn’t appear to be losing his Hall of Fame touch.) Yet the reaction by many conveyed the obvious: that Moss’s leaving New England leaves a corresponding hole in their lineup which the Patriots can’t overcome.

This is where the “oh my god they traded Moss” syndrome turns into full blown “we can’t win the Super Bowl” disease. Some people have no sense of history. Consider:

When it comes to making unpopular personnel moves, no one is more practiced than Bill Belichick.

As a second year coach in Cleveland in 1992, a much less experienced Belichick showed the same determination when he unseated franchise quarterback and local hero Bernie Kosar. He did it again with Drew Bledsoe in 2001.

My favorite example was from 2003. That season, the Patriots were two years removed from their Cinderella Super Bowl run and fresh off falling back to earth the next season. They appeared rebuilt and ready to make another run, but only five days before the season opener, the Pats released starting strong safety and fan favorite, Lawyer Milloy. (By the way, what are the odds a guy named Lawyer Milloy partners in a defensive backfield with another guy named Ty Law for almost a decade?)

Naturally, Milloy turned around and signed with the Patriots Week 1 opponent, the Buffalo Bills. To complete the embarrassment, Milloy recorded a sack against Brady in that game and New England got smoked, 31-0.
Following the game, Tom Jackson, an ESPN analyst and perpetual Super Bowl loser, decided that it was best to get ahead of the media wave and declare what everyone was surely thinking.

“I want to say this very clearly: they hate their coach, and their season could be over” spouted the guy who came up a little short in Super Bowl XXI (the same night that two particularly personal events happened: the New York Giants won the Super Bowl…and I was born).

Jackson’s comments, though undoubtedly galvanizing for a now pissed-off Pats team, resonated. New Englanders, so sure not even 18 months before of Belichick’s genius, questioned the cold and calculating coach. Why had he done this?

Before I get to answering that, it’s obvious to point out how the rest of the 2003 season played out. New England got things straightened out and began a league record 21 straight wins, culminating with their defeat of the Carolina Panthers in Super Bowl XXXVIII, 32-29 (or, as many more people remember it, the "Janet Jackson Titty Game".

Following the game, in probably one of my most favorite media/coach interactions ever, Belichick ran into who else but Tom “I don’t have any sources for what I say” Jackson on the set of NFL Live. According to Michael Holley in his book, Patriot Reign, the following exchange took place:

Belichick would talk…but not, initially, with ESPN. When his friend Chris Berman personally asked him to appear on the air, however, Belichick couldn’t turn him down. They walked on the Reliant Stadium field, passing few workers and television reporters doing stand-ups. On the set Belichick saw Tom Jackson. The coach didn’t want to be diplomatic. He still didn’t like the way the comment from September was handled, and winning the Super Bowl wasn’t going to change his mind about that. Jackson extended his hand to Belichick. The coach looked at him and said “Fuck you.” It was left at that.

Priceless. I know Bill Belichick is one of the most polarizing men in professional football, but say what you want about him (and people will continue to) just don’t knock him on two things:

1. He’s brave about personnel decisions when he's convinced it's in the team's best interest.

2. He doesn’t give a flying fuck about sticking to his guns (especially when it comes to calling out a largely dishonest and sensationalized media).

Why did he trade Randy Dandy? No one can say definitely but I have a feeling Belichick, as always, was concerned about team chemistry. And he’s not sold on the direct net-loss of Randy now catching touchdowns from Brett Favre and not Tom Brady. Having seen his team’s win time and again by subscribing to the tired cliché of “addition through subtraction,” my guess is he believes this will be a shot in the arm for the rest of the receiving corps.

People keep saying the Patriots don’t have a deep threat anymore, but doesn’t this make them more unpredictable? Randy wasn’t exactly the master of running underneath routes. Defensive backs could be fairly certain he was either running a deep out or a go-route. With him gone, opposing defenses (much like regular fans and the Tom Jacksons of the world) can’t be sure of anything. And that’s exactly the way Bill Belichick likes it.

1 comment:

  1. haha i love it, as for a patriots fan, at first i was a bit uncertain with why the trade, but was never really questionable of their chances of another super bowl. With the way the team played two weekends ago, more or less the way the special teams and the D played, and an undeniable championship caliber offense, i'm confident they can still win it again. but as for the bandwagon fans, better known as what Robert Downey Jr would consider a "full retard" (Tropic Thunder), they are more interested in watching the patriots attempt a desperate dandy randy pass vs the strategic ball distribution offense due to their lack of knowledge of sports in general. Like the people of the us who cant enjoy soccer because games end up 1-0. Completely missing necessary strategy. in my opinion. not sure how credited i am......

    i would rather the options of strategic clock management and better ball distribution than the single option of going long to one specific player. Now with Randy gone, the space that he was best at, the long ball, is now open field to manipulate different one v ones. Who knows, wes welker might be finding himself on an audible streak. or even sending Brandon Tate after a long high ball. In turn the optinos are there. Which is an easy segway into the idea that Brady now has more control of pin pointing gaps in the defense. And if planned out correctly, this will allow him and the offense to spend more time on the field than the defense, lets be honest i think the rookie d would also rather see less time on the field.
    -and finally to talk about the idea of Belichick looking out for the teams best interest, i absolutely agree. from the beginning of the season it seemed somewhat obvious that Randy was distracted. Both it being his final contract season with the patriots and his dislike of the media, he was a time bomb ticking away. a man who has zero rings yet says "These shoulders I have on my body, you can put the earth on it." is questionable. If brady were to make that comment, it would be funny because i would think its true. But yes, i believe that the patriots now have more weapons to play around with and that Belichick felt confident in his offense enough that getting rid of Randy was more beneficial to the team, and i will stick by his decisions as long as they dont loose 31-0 to the bills ever again....

    ReplyDelete